Comments on: CherryPy and WSGI http://blog.dowski.com/2006/03/08/cherrypy-and-wsgi-can-play-nice/ Unfortunately, Christian had a Thwart, and the Magpie stayed in play. Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:42:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Matt Smith http://blog.dowski.com/2006/03/08/cherrypy-and-wsgi-can-play-nice/#comment-112083 Matt Smith Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:56:49 +0000 http://blog.dowski.com/?p=161#comment-112083 Okay, I am using CP3.0. I understand this might not be the place for this question but... I am using apache mod_rewrite, without a proxy, so CP gets a url request thats not what I want. Is there a way to change that? Okay, I am using CP3.0. I understand this might not be the place for this question but…

I am using apache mod_rewrite, without a proxy, so CP gets a url request thats not what I want. Is there a way to change that?

]]> By: Kevin Dangoor http://blog.dowski.com/2006/03/08/cherrypy-and-wsgi-can-play-nice/#comment-11537 Kevin Dangoor Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:18:14 +0000 http://blog.dowski.com/?p=161#comment-11537 Excellent post, Christian! I had not known about your wsgi_filter, and I appreciate the enlightenment. I've got a followup here regarding TG and WSGI: http://www.blueskyonmars.com/2006/03/09/cherrypy-and-wsgi/ Excellent post, Christian! I had not known about your wsgi_filter, and I appreciate the enlightenment.

I’ve got a followup here regarding TG and WSGI:
http://www.blueskyonmars.com/2006/03/09/cherrypy-and-wsgi/

]]> By: CherryPy and WSGI at Blue Sky On Mars http://blog.dowski.com/2006/03/08/cherrypy-and-wsgi-can-play-nice/#comment-11536 CherryPy and WSGI at Blue Sky On Mars Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:03:32 +0000 http://blog.dowski.com/?p=161#comment-11536 [...] Christian Wyglendowski posts a great summary of where CherryPy 2.2 stands with regards to WSGI. If you’ve followed the discussion on the various mailing lists and thought CherryPy only minimally handled WSGI, this post does a great job of setting the record straight. CP2.2’s WSGI support is not 100% ideal, but it’s way better than 2.1 and you can do an awful lot with it. Big kudos to Christian, Robert Brewer, Ian Bicking and Phillip Eby for hashing it out and coming up with an implementation that meets CherryPy’s backwards compatibility needs and takes a big step forward. [...] [...] Christian Wyglendowski posts a great summary of where CherryPy 2.2 stands with regards to WSGI. If you’ve followed the discussion on the various mailing lists and thought CherryPy only minimally handled WSGI, this post does a great job of setting the record straight. CP2.2’s WSGI support is not 100% ideal, but it’s way better than 2.1 and you can do an awful lot with it. Big kudos to Christian, Robert Brewer, Ian Bicking and Phillip Eby for hashing it out and coming up with an implementation that meets CherryPy’s backwards compatibility needs and takes a big step forward. [...]

]]> By: christian http://blog.dowski.com/2006/03/08/cherrypy-and-wsgi-can-play-nice/#comment-11534 christian Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:30:57 +0000 http://blog.dowski.com/?p=161#comment-11534 Thanks for the feedback guys. Thanks for the feedback guys.

]]> By: Sylvain http://blog.dowski.com/2006/03/08/cherrypy-and-wsgi-can-play-nice/#comment-11532 Sylvain Thu, 09 Mar 2006 08:43:56 +0000 http://blog.dowski.com/?p=161#comment-11532 Great post Chris! It helps me a lot :D Great post Chris! It helps me a lot :D

]]> By: Uche Ogbuji http://blog.dowski.com/2006/03/08/cherrypy-and-wsgi-can-play-nice/#comment-11531 Uche Ogbuji Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:34:09 +0000 http://blog.dowski.com/?p=161#comment-11531 Very well put. Thanks for this and our discussion yesterday on #cherrypy IRC. It helps me understand the landscape better. Very well put. Thanks for this and our discussion yesterday on #cherrypy IRC. It helps me understand the landscape better.

]]> By: Robert Brewer http://blog.dowski.com/2006/03/08/cherrypy-and-wsgi-can-play-nice/#comment-11530 Robert Brewer Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:00:45 +0000 http://blog.dowski.com/?p=161#comment-11530 FANTASTIC summary. Thanks! FANTASTIC summary. Thanks!

]]>